Traditional methods for making micro and nanostructuring of materials require either several rounds of photolithography and precise registration or the use of serial techniques, such as localized electrodeposition methods, reactive-ion etching, proton and ion beam machining, laser ablation, powder blasting, or electrochemical micromachining These procedures are usually laborious, often expensive, and are especially difficult when dealing with hard/brittle materials and features of submicrometer dimensions.
Conceptually, all these methods share the common assumption that in order to make smaller and more precise architectures, one must first increase the resolution of the “parent” fabrication tool – be it a stamp, or a writing beam, or a milling micro-chisel. Although this “what you print/ablate/drill/mill is what you get” philosophy appears very logical and quite intuitive, it is interesting to note that Nature – the ultimate builder – uses it only rarely to make surface patterns and structures. Indeed, skin patterns in fish, zebras and tigers, compositional zones in sea-shells and agates, or the fantastic three-dimensional shells of radiolarians are not meticulously “imprinted” by some underlying template or a writing tool, but rather emerge spontaneously from a self-organization process carried out by the organism as a whole. On the most abstract level, such process can be viewed as a chemical “program” comprising the details of the chemical reactions involved, information about the migration/delivery of different substrates, and the initial/boundary conditions of the process. The execution of these “instructions” is synonymous with the task of fabrication.
In our research, we apply this biologically-inspired idea of “chemical programming” to the fabrication of technologically relevant micro and nanostructures and devices. The “programs” we execute are based on irreversible inorganic reactions and diffusive transport of the participating chemicals through the supporting “soft” medium. Once the reactions are initiated from well-defined spatial locations defined by our Wet Stamping technique, they “execute programs” contained in their chemical kinetics and their transport properties within the supporting medium. The structures that literally build themselves via complex sequences of reaction and diffusion (RD) events represent stable or metastable points in the process where the “programs” achieve global/local equilibrium.
A variety of chemical “programs” our team has “coded” and executed enabled self-organization of microscopic optical (Nature Mater. 2004, Adv. Mater. 2004, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, J. Appl. Phys. 2005) and microfluidic (Langmuir 2005) devices; 3D structures in metals, glasses, crystals, and semiconductors (Adv. Mater. 2005a,b, 2006, Chem. Mater. 2006); systems that display molecular-level events in the form of macroscopic patterns (J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005a, Chaos 2006); supports for cell spreading and motility studies (Nature Methods 2005, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005b); and more (Soft Matter, 2006).
On the fundamental level, this approach poses intriguing questions regarding (i) the limits of its spatial resolution (i.e., the smallest discrete features that can result from spatially continuous reaction-diffusion fields) and (ii) the ability to reverse-engineer the final, self-organized state to determine the necessary reactions and initial conditions. To understand these issues, our group has combined experiment with theory (nonlinear kinetics, statistical mechanics) and succeeded in extending the method down to the nanoscale (remarkably, to 20 nm resolution, where the classical RD theories fail.

(a) Reaction-diffusion transforms a micropattern of circles into a pattern of submicron lines; interestingly, in doing so, it solves a mathematical problem of surface tiling; (b) RD deposits three metal salts onto different locations of a substrate starting from the same initial geometry; RD builds (c) an array of microlenses in glass and (d) multiple periodic precipitation microstructures in a hydrogel; (e) RD is used to microetch Escher’s lizards into a crystal of K3Fe(CN)(2); (f) RD detects a helix-to-coil phase transition in a gel film and reports it by switching between two different types of color patterns. Scale bars are 50 µm in (a) and (c) and 200 µm in other pictures.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering | McCormick School of Engineering
Northwestern Home | Calendar: Plan-It Purple | Sites A-Z | Search
Prof. Bartosz A. Grzybowski, Associate Professor of Chemical and Biological Engineering
2145 Sheridan Rd, Evanston, Illinois 60208
PI Phone: 847/491.3024 Group Phone: 847/491.3969 (lab) 847/467.0116 (office)
Fax: 847/491.3728 E-mail: Webmaster
Last Updated 04/13/2007 World Wide Web Disclaimer and University Policy Statements
© 2007 Northwestern University

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Programs for reaction-diffusion

Buckle Finder is the reaction-diffusion program featured in “Arrays of microlenses of complex shapes prepared by reaction-diffusion in thin films of ionically doped gels” and “One-step multilevel microfabrication by reaction-diffusion”. (Learn more here)

Pattern Finder is the reaction-diffusion program featured in “Color micro– and nanopatterning with counter-propagating reaction-diffusion fronts”. (Learn more here)